Skip to content

russh has pre-auth DoS via unbounded allocation in its keyboard-interactive auth handler

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 20, 2026 in Eugeny/russh • Updated May 13, 2026

Package

cargo russh (Rust)

Affected versions

< 0.60.1

Patched versions

0.60.1

Description

Summary

A pre-authentication denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the server's keyboard-interactive authentication handler. A malicious client can crash any russh-based server that implements keyboard-interactive auth (e.g., for 2FA/TOTP) with a single malformed packet, requiring no credentials.

Vulnerability Details

In russh/src/server/encrypted.rs, the function read_userauth_info_response decodes a u32 count from the client's SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_INFO_RESPONSE and passes it directly to Vec::with_capacity():

let n = map_err!(u32::decode(r))?;

// Bound both allocation and iteration by remaining packet data to
// prevent a malicious client from causing a multi-GB allocation or
// billions of loop iterations with a crafted count.
// Each response needs at least 4 bytes (length prefix).
let max_responses = r.remaining_len().saturating_add(3) / 4;
let n = (n as usize).min(max_responses);
let mut responses = Vec::with_capacity(n);
for _ in 0..n {
    responses.push(Bytes::decode(r).ok())
}

An attacker can send n = 0x10000000 (268M) or larger in a minimal packet (~50 bytes after encryption). The server attempts to allocate n * ~24 bytes (size of Option<Bytes>) = ~6.4GB, causing an OOM crash.

Attack Flow

  1. Attacker connects via TCP, completes key exchange (no credentials needed -- this is the anonymous DH handshake, not authentication)
  2. Sends USERAUTH_REQUEST with method keyboard-interactive
  3. Server handler returns Auth::Partial with prompts (standard for 2FA/TOTP)
  4. Attacker sends USERAUTH_INFO_RESPONSE with n = 0x10000000 and no response data
  5. Server calls Vec::with_capacity(268_435_456), OOM killed

No authentication is required. The allocation occurs before the handler validates any credentials. The attack is repeatable faster than the server can restart.

Affected Configurations

Any russh-based server where the Handler::auth_keyboard_interactive implementation returns Auth::Partial (i.e., sends prompts to the client). The default handler returns Auth::reject() and is not affected.

Source code review suggests that downstream projects using keyboard-interactive for multi-step auth (e.g., TOTP/2FA) follow the affected pattern, since returning Auth::Partial before credential verification is the intended API usage for prompting.

Confirmed End-to-End PoC

There is a complete Docker-contained PoC confirming the OOM kill:

  • Minimal russh server returning Auth::Partial for keyboard-interactive
  • Python client (paramiko for key exchange) sends malformed USERAUTH_INFO_RESPONSE
  • Container with 512MB memory limit; server is OOM-killed (exit code 137)

Available on request.

Proposed Fix

Cap the Vec::with_capacity allocation to what the remaining packet data can actually contain. Each response requires at least 4 bytes (length prefix), so:

let n = map_err!(u32::decode(r))?;

// Bound both allocation and iteration by remaining packet data to
// prevent a malicious client from causing a multi-GB allocation or
// billions of loop iterations with a crafted count.
// Each response needs at least 4 bytes (length prefix).
let max_responses = r.remaining_len().saturating_add(3) / 4;
let n = (n as usize).min(max_responses);
let mut responses = Vec::with_capacity(n);
for _ in 0..n {
    responses.push(Bytes::decode(r).ok())
}

This bounds the allocation to at most the packet size (~256KB), while preserving the existing behavior for well-formed packets. This fix has been implemented, tested, and contributed via the temporary private fork.

Severity

Pre-auth, remote, no credentials required, crashes the server process affecting all active sessions.

References

@Eugeny Eugeny published to Eugeny/russh Apr 20, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 24, 2026
Reviewed Apr 24, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 8, 2026
Last updated May 13, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(54th percentile)

Weaknesses

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value

The product allocates memory based on an untrusted, large size value, but it does not ensure that the size is within expected limits, allowing arbitrary amounts of memory to be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-42189

GHSA ID

GHSA-f5v4-2wr6-hqmg

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.